Saturday 5 September 2015

Excerpts from Marcus Aurelius

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus (26 April 121 – 17 March 180 AD), or more commonly just "Marcus Aurelius" was Roman Emperor from 161 to 180.

Marcus Aurelius' Stoic tome Meditations, written in Greek while on campaign between 170 and 180, is still revered as a literary monument to a philosophy of service and duty, describing how to find and preserve equanimity in the midst of conflict by following nature as a source of guidance and inspiration.

It is worth noting, that he is thought to have written this down within the last decade of his life, from age 49 to 59 (nearly 60).

"Meditations" tends to be one single book, small by today's standards, with what we might think of as chapters written down as "Book"-*number*. Since it is often the focus of students, many copies include paragraph numbers.

The first excerpt I present to you is from Book Eight. Note that while paragraphs 13, 14, and 15 appear to be part of one thought, the paragraphs are mostly separate thoughts.

"11. Ask yourself, What is this thing in itself, by its own special constitution? What is it in substance, and in form, and in matter? What is its function in the world? For how long does it subsist?

12. When it is hard to shake off sleep, remind yourself that to be going about the duties you owe society is to be obeying the laws of man's nature and your own constitution, whereas sleep is something we share with the unreasoning brute creation; and furthermore, that obedience to one's own nature is the more proper, the more suitable, and indeed the more agreeable course.

13. If possible, make it a habit to discover the essential character of every impression, its effect on the self, and its response to a logical analysis.

14. No matter whom you meet, always begin by asking yourself, What are his views on the goodness or badness of things? For then, if his beliefs about pleasure and pain and their causes, or about repute and disrepute, or life and death are of a certain type, I shall not be surprised or scandalized to find his actions in keeping with them; I shall tell myself that he has no choice.

15. Nobody is surprised when a fig-tree brings forth figs. Similarly, we ought to be ashamed of our surprise when the world produces its normal crop of happenings. A physician or a shipmaster would blush to be surprised if a patient proves feverish, or a wind contrary.

16. To change your mind and defer to correction is not to sacrifice your independence; for such an act is your own, in pursuance of your own impulse, your own judgement, and your own thinking.

17. If the choice is yours, why do the thing? If another's, where are you to lay the blame for it? On gods? On atoms? Either would be insanity. All thoughts of blame are out of place. If you can, correct the offender; if not, correct the offence; if that too is impossible, what is the point of recriminations? Nothing is worth doing pointlessly.

18. That which dies does not drop out of the world. Here it remains; and here too, therefore, it changes and is resolved into its several particles; that is, into the elements which go to form the universe and yourself. They themselves likewise undergo change, and yet from them comes no complaint."

Further on in Book Nine, thoughts are turned towards the nature of the universe and how best to approach the uncertainty of gods or chaos - in modern terms: the question of whether or not there is a god. Note that here "upwards and downwards" refers to changing successively from fire to air, air to water, water to earth, and then back again in the reverse order. (I don't know, it's just a note in the copy I am reading...)

"28. Upwards and downwards, from age to age, the cycles of the universe follow their unchanging round. It may be that the World-Mind wills each separate happening in succession; and if so, then accept the consequences. Or it may be, there was but one primal act of will, of which all else is the sequel; every event being thus the germ of another. To put it another way, things are either isolated units, or they form one inseparable whole. If that whole be God, then all is well; but if aimless chance, at least you need not be aimless also.
   Soon earth will cover us all. Then in time earth, too, will change; later, what issues from this change will itself in turn incessantly change, and so again will all that then takes its place, even unto the world's end. To let the mind dwell on these swiftly rolling billows of change and transformation is to know a contempt for all things mortal.

29. The primal Cause is like a river in flood; it bears everything along. How ignoble are the little men who play at politics and persuade themselves that they are acting in the true spirit of philosophy. Babes, incapable even of wiping their noses! What then, you who are a man? Why, do what nature is asking of you at this moment. Set about it as the opportunity offers, and no glancing around to see if you are observed. But do not expect Plato's ideal commonwealth; be satisfied if even a trifling endeavour comes off well, and count the result no mean success. For who can hope to alter men's convictions; and without change of conviction what can there be but grudging subjection and feigned assent? Oh yes; now go on and talk to me of Alexander, and Philip, and Demetrius of Phaleron. If those men did in truth understand the will of Nature and school themselves to follow it, that is their own affair. But if it was nothing more than a stage-role they were playing, no court has condemned me to imitate their example. Philosophy is a modest profession, all simplicity and plain dealing. Never try to seduce me into solemn pretentiousness.

30. Look down from above on the numberless herds of mankind, with their mysterious ceremonies, their divers voyagings in storm and calm, and all the chequered pattern of their comings and gatherings and goings. Go on to consider the life of bygone generations; and then the life of all those who are yet to come; and even at the present day, the life of the hordes of far-off savages. In your very name; how many more will have speedily forgotten it; how many, perhaps praising you now, who will soon enough be abusing you; and that therefore remembrance, glory, and all else together are things of no worth.

31. When beset from without by circumstance, be unperturbed; when prompted from within to action, be just and fair: in fine, let both will and deed issue in behaviour that is social and fulfils the law of your being.

32. Many of the anxieties that harass you are superfluous: being but creatures of your own fancy, you can rid yourself of them and expand into an ampler region, letting your thought sweep over the entire universe, contemplating the illimitable tracts of eternity, marking the swiftness of change in each created thing, and contrasting the brief span between birth and dissolution with the endless aeons that precede the one and the infinity that follows the other.

33. A little while, and all that is before your eyes now will have perished. Those who witness its passing will go the same road themselves before long; and then what will there be to choose between the oldest grandfather and the baby that died in its cradle?

34. Observe the instincts that guide these men; the ends they struggle for, the grounds on which they like and value things. In short, picture their souls laid bare. Yet they imagine their praises or censures have weight to help or hurt. What presumption!

35. Loss is nothing else but change, and change is Nature's delight. Ever since the world began, things have been ordered by her decree in the selfsame fashion as they are at this day, and as other similar things will be ordered to the end of time. How, then, can you say that it is all amiss, and ever will be so; that no power among all the gods in heaven can avail to mend it; and that the world lies condemned to a thraldom of ills without end?

36. The substance of us all is doomed to decay; the moisture and the clay, the bones, and the fetor. Our precious marble is but a callosity of the earth, our gold and silver her sediment; our raiment shreds of hair, our purple a fish's gore; and this with all things else. So too is the very breath of our lives - ever passing as it does from this one to that.

37. Enough of this miserable war of life, these everlasting grumbles, these monkey antics. Why must you agitate yourself so? Nothing unprecedented is happening; so what is it that disturbs you? The form of it? Take a good look at it. The matter of it? Look well at that, too. Beyond form and matter, these is nothing more. Even at this late hour, set yourself to become a simpler and better man in the sight of the gods. For the mastering of that lesson, three years are as good as a hundred.

38. If he sinned, the harm is his own. Yet perhaps, after all, he did not.

39. Either things must have their origin in one single intelligent source, and all fall into place to compose, as it were, one single body - in which case no part ought to complain of what happens for the good of the whole - or else the world is nothing but atoms and their confused minglings and dispersions. So why be so harassed? Say to the Reason at your helm, 'Come, are you dead and in decay? Is this some part you are playing? Have you sunk to the level of a beast of the field, grazing and herding with the rest?'

40. The gods either have power or they have not. If they have not, why pray to them? If they have, then instead of praying to be granted or spared such-and-such a thing, why not rather pray to be delivered from dreading it, or lusting for it, or grieving over it? Clearly, if they can help a man at all, they can help him in this way. You will say, perhaps, 'But all that is something they have put in my own power.' Then surely it were better to use your power and be a free man, than to hanker like a slave and a beggar for something that is not in your power. Besides, who told you the gods never lend their aid even towards things that do lie in our own power? Begin praying in this way, and you will see. Where another man prays 'Grant that I may possess this woman.' let your own prayer be, 'Grant that I may not lust to possess her.' Where he prays, 'Grant me to be rid of such-and-such a one.' you pray, 'Take from me my desire to be rid of him.' Where he begs, 'Spare me the loss of my precious child.' beg rather to be delivered from the terror of losing him. In short, give your petitions a turn in this direction, and see what comes."

This is a mere sampling of 'Meditations', if you have found it interesting or confusing, or both, I would recommend that you acquire a copy of this work. Though keep in mind that Marcus Aurelius made no action to make copies or show his writings to anyone; he is essentially addressing himself.

Friday 4 September 2015

STEM study as productivity?

So I've been mulling it over a bit and I think STEM (Science, Tech, Engineering, Maths) studies should be counted as productivity.

In the most basic sense - the more people in our economy that have training in STEM fields, the more secure we are. More specifically to productivity (the production of new goods) STEM field qualifications could be seen as goods in that they are useful and desired by industry the same way that cars are useful and desired by commuters.

Indeed an individual who has a significant STEM qualification holds a valuable asset that employers will pay a premium to access. The skills are very valuable.

On the other hand... 

The extra pay can be said to go into increasing the price of the goods produced - increasing their value, and so increasing the value of new goods produced. So does that mean we are already counting the use of STEM skills as part of GDP?

GDP also tends to refer to final goods, not components to be used in further production - skill creation could easily fall into that latter category.

So, maybe it shouldn't go into technical analysis under GDP, but does that mean we shouldn't consider it to be productivity at all?

Given that our (UK) government seems to be fine with the idea of supporting companies with direct subsidies, even ones which do not directly contribute to GDP figures, I am going to prefer the idea that STEM education should be included in GDP calculations when considering economic policy, just not when actually measuring GDP.

My reasoning is that when a student studies STEM, they are acquiring an asset that will contribute to GDP in the future. Is this (relevantly) different, from the government's viewpoint, of a bank approving a business loan?

The (UK) government seems very concerned with making sure the banks are willing to lend.
My position is that they should be equally concerned with making sure people are willing to study.